Seasonal Time Dilation due to Earth's Eccentric Orbit

Just curious to see how large the effect is.


In [1]:
%matplotlib inline
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np

Basic properties concerning Earth's orbit about the Sun and some of the physics parameters involved in the problem.


In [16]:
d_perihelion = 1.47098074e11  # m
d_aphelion   = 1.52097701e11  # m
d_average    = 1.4959787e11   # m

GMsun  = 1.3271244002e20      # m^3 s^-2
MEarth = 5.9722e24            # kg

c = 2.99792458e8              # m s^-1

Based on these numbers, we can estimate the gravitational force at aphelion and perihelion to be


In [17]:
g_perihelion = GMsun*MEarth/np.power(d_perihelion, 2)
g_aphelion   = GMsun*MEarth/np.power(d_aphelion, 2)
g_average    = GMsun*MEarth/np.power(d_average, 2)

Alternatively, we can base the estimate on the relative strength, which relieves uncertainties due to GMsun and MEarth.


In [5]:
g_ratio = np.power(d_aphelion/d_perihelion, 2)

We see that the strength of gravitational force between the Earth and Sun is about 7% larger at perihelion as compared to aphelion.


In [6]:
print g_ratio


1.06913199477

Now we must convert the relative difference in gravitational force into a difference in time dilation for various processes. Since we're dealing with the Sun, we may adopt the Schwarzschild metric, which suggests \begin{equation} t_0 = t_f \left( 1 - \frac{r_s}{r} \right)^{1/2}. \end{equation} The Schwarzschild radius for the Sun is


In [8]:
r_s = 2.0*GMsun/np.power(c, 2)

which allows us to compute the relative difference in $t_0$ based on the variable Earth-Sun distance.


In [40]:
t0_ratio = np.sqrt(1.0 - (r_s / d_perihelion)) / np.sqrt(1.0 - (r_s / d_aphelion))
t0_ratio_aphelion   = np.sqrt(1.0 - r_s / d_aphelion) / np.sqrt(1.0 - r_s / d_average)
t0_ratio_perihelion = np.sqrt(1.0 - r_s / d_perihelion) / np.sqrt(1.0 - r_s / d_average)

The ratio is


In [41]:
print t0_ratio


0.99999999967

which is small, but perhaps non-neligible when it comes to seasonal variations in the decay of Potassium-40, for example. In the case of the DAMA experiment, they have 250 kg of sodium iodide crystals with a small 20 ppb contamination of Potassium-40. Potassium-40 is radioactive with a long half-life of $1.251\times10^9$ years. There are two primary decay channels: \begin{equation} ^{40}\textrm{K}\ \rightarrow\ ^{40}\textrm{Ca} + \beta^{-} + \bar{\nu} \end{equation} and \begin{equation} ^{40}\textrm{K} + \beta^{-}\ \rightarrow\ ^{40}\textrm{Ar} + \gamma + \nu \end{equation} which occur about 90% and 10% of the time, respectively.

The molar mass of sodium iodide is 149.89 g mol$^{-1}$, meaning in 250 kg there are


In [13]:
moles_NaI = 250.0e3/149.89
print moles_NaI, " moles of NaI,"


1667.88978584  moles of NaI,

which translates into


In [14]:
N_NaI = moles_NaI*6.022140857e23
print N_NaI, "NaI molecules."


1.00442672243e+27 NaI molecules.

Assuming the maximum contamination fraction for Potassium-40 of 20 ppb, there are roughly


In [15]:
N_40K = 20.0*N_NaI/1.0e9
print N_40K, "Potassium-40 atoms in the sample."


2.00885344486e+19 Potassium-40 atoms in the sample.

Now our task is to estimate the approximate increase or decrease in Potassium-40 decays based on variations in the Sun-Earth gravitational potential.

During a single half-life for Potassium-40, approximately $1\times10^{19}$ atoms decay. Given a mean half-life of $1.251\times10^{9}$ years, there will be approximately


In [20]:
decay_rate_average = 1.0e19/(1.251e9*60.0*60.0*24.0*365.256366)
print decay_rate_average, "decays per second on average."


253.297646099 decays per second on average.

The decay rate at perihelion and aphelion will be slightly different due to the gravitational potential of the Earth.


In [21]:
decay_rate_aphelion = 1.0e19/(1.251e9*60.0*60.0*24.0*365.256366*t0_ratio_aphelion)
print decay_rate_aphelion, "decays per second at aphelion."


253.297646058 decays per second at aphelion.

In [22]:
decay_rate_perihelion = 1.0e19/(1.251e9*60.0*60.0*24.0*365.256366*t0_ratio_perihelion)
print decay_rate_perihelion, "decays per second at perihelion."


253.297646141 decays per second at perihelion.

Thus, during a given 24 hour period, one would expect


In [31]:
decay_rate_aphelion = 1.0e19/(1.251e9*365.256366*t0_ratio_aphelion)
print decay_rate_aphelion, "decays per day at aphelion and"


21884916.6194 decays per day at aphelion and

In [33]:
decay_rate_perihelion = 1.0e19/(1.251e9*365.256366*t0_ratio_perihelion)
print decay_rate_perihelion, "decays per day at perihelion."


21884916.6266 decays per day at perihelion.

which yields a difference of


In [42]:
print decay_rate_perihelion - decay_rate_aphelion, "decays per day between summer and winter."


0.00722143054008 decays per day between summer and winter.

which leads to a difference in


In [43]:
print (decay_rate_perihelion - decay_rate_aphelion)/250.0, "decays per kg per day."


2.88857221603e-05 decays per kg per day.

This level is far below the variation in counts per day observed by the DAMA experiment, which is approximately 0.05 cpd/kg/keV.