In [1]:
%pylab inline
%precision 1
Out[1]:
In [2]:
B = 0.5 # [T]
R = 0.25 # [Ohm]
l = 0.5 # [m]
Vb = 120 # [V]
In [3]:
Fapp = 20 # [N]
i = Fapp / (B*l)
i
Out[3]:
Amperes. The induced voltage in the bar will be $$ e_\text{ind} = V_B - iR $$
In [4]:
e_ind = Vb - i*R
e_ind
Out[4]:
Volts, and the velocity of the bar will be
$$v = \frac{e_\text{ind}}{Bl}$$
In [5]:
v = e_ind / (B*l)
v
Out[5]:
metres/second.
In [6]:
B = 0.45 # [T]
Fapp = 20 # [N]
i = Fapp / (B*l)
i
Out[6]:
Amperes. The induced voltage in the bar will be
$$ e_\text{ind} = V_B - iR $$
In [7]:
e_ind = Vb - i*R
e_ind
Out[7]:
Volts, and the velocity of the bar will be
$$v = \frac{e_\text{ind}}{Bl}$$
In [8]:
v = e_ind / (B*l)
v
Out[8]:
In [9]:
Vb = 100 # [V]
B = 0.45 # [T]
Fapp = 20 # [N]
i = Fapp / (B*l)
i
Out[9]:
Amperes. The induced voltage in the bar will be
$$ e_\text{ind} = V_B - iR $$
In [10]:
e_ind = Vb - i*R
e_ind
Out[10]:
Volts, and the velocity of the bar will be
$$v = \frac{e_\text{ind}}{Bl}$$
In [11]:
v = e_ind/ (B*l)
v
Out[11]:
m/s.
From the results of the two previous parts, we can see that there are two ways to control the speed of a linear dc machine. Reducing the flux density $B$ of the machine increases the steady-state speed, and reducing the battery voltage $V_B$ decreases the stead-state speed of the machine. Both of these speed control methods work for real dc machines as well as for linear machines.