In [ ]:
%matplotlib inline
~mne.Annotations
data structuresEvents and :class:~mne.Annotations
are quite similar.
This tutorial highlights their differences and similarities, and tries to shed
some light on which one is preferred to use in different situations when using
MNE.
Here are the definitions from the glossary
.
events
Events correspond to specific time points in raw data; e.g., triggers,
experimental condition events, etc. MNE represents events with integers
that are stored in numpy arrays of shape (n_events, 3). Such arrays are
classically obtained from a trigger channel, also referred to as stim
channel.
annotations
An annotation is defined by an onset, a duration, and a string
description. It can contain information about the experiment, but
also details on signals marked by a human: bad data segments,
sleep scores, sleep events (spindles, K-complex) etc.
Both events and :class:~mne.Annotations
can be seen as triplets
where the first element answers to when something happens and the last
element refers to what it is.
The main difference is that events represent the onset in samples taking into
account the first sample value
(:attr:raw.first_samp <mne.io.Raw.first_samp>
), and the description is
an integer value.
In contrast, :class:~mne.Annotations
represents the
onset
in seconds (relative to the reference orig_time
),
and the description
is an arbitrary string.
There is no correspondence between the second element of events and
:class:~mne.Annotations
.
For events, the second element corresponds to the previous value on the
stimulus channel from which events are extracted. In practice, the second
element is therefore in most cases zero.
The second element of :class:~mne.Annotations
is a float
indicating its duration in seconds.
See sphx_glr_auto_examples_io_plot_read_events.py
for a complete example of how to read, select, and visualize events;
and sphx_glr_auto_tutorials_plot_artifacts_correction_rejection.py
to
learn how :class:~mne.Annotations
are used to mark bad segments
of data.
The following example shows the recorded events in sample_audvis_raw.fif
and
marks bad segments due to eye blinks.
In [ ]:
import os.path as op
import numpy as np
import mne
# Load the data
data_path = mne.datasets.sample.data_path()
fname = op.join(data_path, 'MEG', 'sample', 'sample_audvis_raw.fif')
raw = mne.io.read_raw_fif(fname)
First we'll create and plot events associated with the experimental paradigm:
In [ ]:
# extract the events array from the stim channel
events = mne.find_events(raw)
# Specify event_id dictionary based on the meaning of experimental triggers
event_id = {'Auditory/Left': 1, 'Auditory/Right': 2,
'Visual/Left': 3, 'Visual/Right': 4,
'smiley': 5, 'button': 32}
color = {1: 'green', 2: 'yellow', 3: 'red', 4: 'c', 5: 'black', 32: 'blue'}
mne.viz.plot_events(events, raw.info['sfreq'], raw.first_samp, color=color,
event_id=event_id)
Next, we're going to detect eye blinks and turn them into
:class:~mne.Annotations
:
In [ ]:
# find blinks
annotated_blink_raw = raw.copy()
eog_events = mne.preprocessing.find_eog_events(raw)
n_blinks = len(eog_events)
# Turn blink events into Annotations of 0.5 seconds duration,
# each centered on the blink event:
onset = eog_events[:, 0] / raw.info['sfreq'] - 0.25
duration = np.repeat(0.5, n_blinks)
description = ['bad blink'] * n_blinks
annot = mne.Annotations(onset, duration, description,
orig_time=raw.info['meas_date'])
annotated_blink_raw.set_annotations(annot)
# plot the annotated raw
annotated_blink_raw.plot()
An important element of :class:~mne.Annotations
is
orig_time
which is the time reference for the onset
.
It is key to understand that when calling
:func:raw.set_annotations <mne.io.Raw.set_annotations>
, given
annotations are copied and transformed so that
:class:raw.annotations.orig_time <mne.Annotations>
matches the recording time of the raw object.
Refer to the documentation of :class:~mne.Annotations
to see
the expected behavior depending on meas_date
and orig_time
.
Where meas_date
is the recording time stored in
:class:Info <mne.Info>
.
You can find more information about :class:Info <mne.Info>
in
sphx_glr_auto_tutorials_plot_info.py
.
We'll now manipulate some simulated annotations.
The first annotations has orig_time
set to None
while the
second is set to a chosen POSIX timestamp for illustration purposes.
Note that both annotations have different onset
values.
In [ ]:
# Create an annotation object with orig_time undefined (default)
annot_none = mne.Annotations(onset=[0, 2, 9], duration=[0.5, 4, 0],
description=['foo', 'bar', 'foo'],
orig_time=None)
print(annot_none)
# Create an annotation object with orig_time
orig_time = '2002-12-03 19:01:31.676071'
annot_orig = mne.Annotations(onset=[22, 24, 31], duration=[0.5, 4, 0],
description=['foo', 'bar', 'foo'],
orig_time=orig_time)
print(annot_orig)
Now we create two raw objects and set each with different annotations. Then we plot both raw objects to compare the annotations.
In [ ]:
# Create two cropped copies of raw with the two previous annotations
raw_a = raw.copy().crop(tmax=12).set_annotations(annot_none)
raw_b = raw.copy().crop(tmax=12).set_annotations(annot_orig)
# Plot the raw objects
raw_a.plot()
raw_b.plot()
Note that although the onset
values of both annotations were different,
due to complementary orig_time
they are now identical. This is because
the first one (annot_none
), once set in raw, adopted its orig_time
.
The second one (annot_orig
) already had an orig_time
, so its
orig_time
was changed to match the onset time of the raw. Changing an
already defined orig_time
of annotations caused its onset
to be
recalibrated with respect to the new orig_time
. As a result both
annotations have now identical onset
and identical orig_time
:
In [ ]:
# Show the annotations in the raw objects
print(raw_a.annotations)
print(raw_b.annotations)
# Show that the onsets are the same
np.set_printoptions(precision=6)
print(raw_a.annotations.onset)
print(raw_b.annotations.onset)
Notice again that for the case where orig_time
is None
,
it is assumed that the orig_time
is the time of the first sample of data.
In [ ]:
raw_delta = (1 / raw.info['sfreq'])
print('raw.first_sample is {}'.format(raw.first_samp * raw_delta))
print('annot_none.onset[0] is {}'.format(annot_none.onset[0]))
print('raw_a.annotations.onset[0] is {}'.format(raw_a.annotations.onset[0]))
It is possible to concatenate two annotations with the + operator (just like
lists) if both share the same orig_time
In [ ]:
annot = mne.Annotations(onset=[10], duration=[0.5],
description=['foobar'],
orig_time=orig_time)
annot = annot_orig + annot # concatenation
print(annot)
Note that you can also save annotations to disk in FIF format::
>>> annot.save('my-annot.fif')
Or as CSV with onsets in (absolute) ISO timestamps::
>>> annot.save('my-annot.csv')
Or in plain text with onsets relative to orig_time
::
>>> annot.save('my-annot.txt')