In [18]:
from IPython.display import Image
Image(filename='ps6_prob1.png')
Out[18]:
A: is hematite and B is magnetite.
Start with the function dir2cart.py from Problem set # 2:
In [2]:
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
def dir2cart(data):
""" Converts data array with [Declination, Inclination, Intensity]
to cartesian coordinates, X=North, Y=East, Z=Down
Returns array with [X,Y,Z]
"""
# convert degrees to radians for declination and inclination
decs,incs,ints=np.radians(data[0]),np.radians(data[1]),data[2]
X=ints*np.cos(decs)*np.cos(incs)
Y=ints*np.sin(decs)*np.cos(incs)
Z=ints*np.sin(incs)
cart=np.array([X,Y,Z]).transpose()
return cart
Read in the datafile demag.dat in the Chapter_6 directory and convert the dec, inc, int data into X,Y,Z.
In [3]:
data=np.loadtxt('Chapter_6/demag.dat').transpose()
# Put Temperature in Ts and Ints, Decs Incs into their own lists
Ts,Ints,Decs,Incs=data[0],data[1],data[2],data[3]
print (dir2cart([Decs,Incs,Ints])) # package up and send to our function
For this we just have to normalize Ints to the first step and re-run dir2cart.
In [4]:
Ints=Ints/Ints[0] # This will normalize by the first step.
In [6]:
cart=dir2cart([Decs,Incs,Ints]).transpose() # get X,Y,Zs
print (cart) # need to transpose so X is cart[0], etc.
Now plot X and Y components versus Temperature
In [9]:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
%matplotlib inline
plt.plot(Ts,cart[0],'ro') # plot X versus T as red circles
plt.plot(Ts,cart[0],'r-') # and as red line
plt.plot(Ts,cart[1],'bs') # plot Y versus T as blue squares
plt.plot(Ts,cart[1],'b-') # and as blue line
plt.xlabel('Temperature $^{\circ}$C') # add X label using latex syntax
plt.ylabel('Magnetization'); # and Y label
The strong field component (2 T) was along X and it is the red line. This survives until way above 600$^{\circ}$C and is probably hematite. The lower coercivity component (0.4 T) was along Y (the blue line). It and dies between 550 and 600$^{\circ}$C. It is probably the magnetite component.
In [24]:
Image(filename='microprobe.png')
Out[24]:
A Curie temperature of 420$^{\circ}$C could indicate a titanomagnetite of composition x $\simeq$ 0.25 (Figure 6.4c) or a titanohematite with composition x $\simeq$ 0.3 (Figure 6.6b in book). But the observation that the coercivity spectrum indicates $\mu_oH_c < $ 30 mT indicates that you are dealing with titanomagnetite rather than Ti-poor titanohematite which would have $\mu_oH_c > $ 30 mT. This ferromagnetic mineral must be a titanomagnetite with x $\simeq$ 0.25.
A Curie temperature of 200$^{\circ}$C could indicate a titanomagnetite of composition x $\simeq$ 0.6 (Figure 6.4c) or a titanohematite with composition x $\simeq$ 0.55 (Figure 6.6b). The microprobe data indicate a TiO:(Fe2O3+FeO) ratio which is higher than any titanomagnetite, but is consistent with a titanohematite with composition y$\simeq$ 0.55. The ferromagnetic mineral must be a titanohematite with y $\simeq$ 0.55.