This notebook serves as supporting material for topics covered in Chapter 18 - Learning from Examples , Chapter 19 - Knowledge in Learning, Chapter 20 - Learning Probabilistic Models from the book Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. This notebook uses implementations from learning.py. Let's start by importing everything from the module:
In [1]:
from learning import *
from notebook import *
In this notebook, we learn about agents that can improve their behavior through diligent study of their own experiences.
An agent is learning if it improves its performance on future tasks after making observations about the world.
There are three types of feedback that determine the three main types of learning:
In Supervised Learning the agent observes some example input-output pairs and learns a function that maps from input to output.
Example: Let's think of an agent to classify images containing cats or dogs. If we provide an image containing a cat or a dog, this agent should output a string "cat" or "dog" for that particular image. To teach this agent, we will give a lot of input-output pairs like {cat image-"cat"}, {dog image-"dog"} to the agent. The agent then learns a function that maps from an input image to one of those strings.
In Unsupervised Learning the agent learns patterns in the input even though no explicit feedback is supplied. The most common type is clustering: detecting potential useful clusters of input examples.
Example: A taxi agent would develop a concept of good traffic days and bad traffic days without ever being given labeled examples.
In Reinforcement Learning the agent learns from a series of reinforcements—rewards or punishments.
Example: Let's talk about an agent to play the popular Atari game—Pong. We will reward a point for every correct move and deduct a point for every wrong move from the agent. Eventually, the agent will figure out its actions prior to reinforcement were most responsible for it.
For the following tutorials we will use a range of datasets, to better showcase the strengths and weaknesses of the algorithms. The datasests are the following:
Fisher's Iris: Each item represents a flower, with four measurements: the length and the width of the sepals and petals. Each item/flower is categorized into one of three species: Setosa, Versicolor and Virginica.
Zoo: The dataset holds different animals and their classification as "mammal", "fish", etc. The new animal we want to classify has the following measurements: 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 4, 1, 0, 1 (don't concern yourself with what the measurements mean).
To make using the datasets easier, we have written a class, DataSet, in learning.py. The tutorials found here make use of this class.
Let's have a look at how it works before we get started with the algorithms.
A lot of the datasets we will work with are .csv files (although other formats are supported too). We have a collection of sample datasets ready to use on aima-data. Two examples are the datasets mentioned above (iris.csv and zoo.csv). You can find plenty datasets online, and a good repository of such datasets is UCI Machine Learning Repository.
In such files, each line corresponds to one item/measurement. Each individual value in a line represents a feature and usually there is a value denoting the class of the item.
You can find the code for the dataset here:
In [ ]:
%psource DataSet
examples: Holds the items of the dataset. Each item is a list of values.
attrs: The indexes of the features (by default in the range of [0,f), where f is the number of features. For example, item[i] returns the feature at index i of item.
attrnames: An optional list with attribute names. For example, item[s], where s is a feature name, returns the feature of name s in item.
target: The attribute a learning algorithm will try to predict. By default the last attribute.
inputs: This is the list of attributes without the target.
values: A list of lists which holds the set of possible values for the corresponding attribute/feature. If initially None, it gets computed (by the function setproblem) from the examples.
distance: The distance function used in the learner to calculate the distance between two items. By default mean_boolean_error.
name: Name of the dataset.
source: The source of the dataset (url or other). Not used in the code.
exclude: A list of indexes to exclude from inputs. The list can include either attribute indexes (attrs) or names (attrnames).
These functions help modify a DataSet object to your needs.
sanitize: Takes as input an example and returns it with non-input (target) attributes replaced by None. Useful for testing. Keep in mind that the example given is not itself sanitized, but instead a sanitized copy is returned.
classes_to_numbers: Maps the class names of a dataset to numbers. If the class names are not given, they are computed from the dataset values. Useful for classifiers that return a numerical value instead of a string.
remove_examples: Removes examples containing a given value. Useful for removing examples with missing values, or for removing classes (needed for binary classifiers).
In [3]:
iris = DataSet(name="iris")
To check that we imported the correct dataset, we can do the following:
In [4]:
print(iris.examples[0])
print(iris.inputs)
Which correctly prints the first line in the csv file and the list of attribute indexes.
When importing a dataset, we can specify to exclude an attribute (for example, at index 1) by setting the parameter exclude to the attribute index or name.
In [5]:
iris2 = DataSet(name="iris",exclude=[1])
print(iris2.inputs)
In [6]:
print(iris.examples[:3])
Then we will print attrs, attrnames, target, input. Notice how attrs holds values in [0,4], but since the fourth attribute is the target, inputs holds values in [0,3].
In [7]:
print("attrs:", iris.attrs)
print("attrnames (by default same as attrs):", iris.attrnames)
print("target:", iris.target)
print("inputs:", iris.inputs)
Now we will print all the possible values for the first feature/attribute.
In [8]:
print(iris.values[0])
Finally we will print the dataset's name and source. Keep in mind that we have not set a source for the dataset, so in this case it is empty.
In [9]:
print("name:", iris.name)
print("source:", iris.source)
A useful combination of the above is dataset.values[dataset.target] which returns the possible values of the target. For classification problems, this will return all the possible classes. Let's try it:
In [10]:
print(iris.values[iris.target])
We will now take a look at the auxiliary functions found in the class.
First we will take a look at the sanitize function, which sets the non-input values of the given example to None.
In this case we want to hide the class of the first example, so we will sanitize it.
Note that the function doesn't actually change the given example; it returns a sanitized copy of it.
In [11]:
print("Sanitized:",iris.sanitize(iris.examples[0]))
print("Original:",iris.examples[0])
Currently the iris dataset has three classes, setosa, virginica and versicolor. We want though to convert it to a binary class dataset (a dataset with two classes). The class we want to remove is "virginica". To accomplish that we will utilize the helper function remove_examples.
In [12]:
iris2 = DataSet(name="iris")
iris2.remove_examples("virginica")
print(iris2.values[iris2.target])
We also have classes_to_numbers. For a lot of the classifiers in the module (like the Neural Network), classes should have numerical values. With this function we map string class names to numbers.
In [13]:
print("Class of first example:",iris2.examples[0][iris2.target])
iris2.classes_to_numbers()
print("Class of first example:",iris2.examples[0][iris2.target])
As you can see "setosa" was mapped to 0.
Finally, we take a look at find_means_and_deviations. It finds the means and standard deviations of the features for each class.
In [14]:
means, deviations = iris.find_means_and_deviations()
print("Setosa feature means:", means["setosa"])
print("Versicolor mean for first feature:", means["versicolor"][0])
print("Setosa feature deviations:", deviations["setosa"])
print("Virginica deviation for second feature:",deviations["virginica"][1])
Since we will use the iris dataset extensively in this notebook, below we provide a visualization tool that helps in comprehending the dataset and thus how the algorithms work.
We plot the dataset in a 3D space using matplotlib and the function show_iris from notebook.py. The function takes as input three parameters, i, j and k, which are indicises to the iris features, "Sepal Length", "Sepal Width", "Petal Length" and "Petal Width" (0 to 3). By default we show the first three features.
In [15]:
iris = DataSet(name="iris")
show_iris()
show_iris(0, 1, 3)
show_iris(1, 2, 3)
You can play around with the values to get a good look at the dataset.
In a lot of algorithms (like the k-Nearest Neighbors algorithm), there is a need to compare items, finding how similar or close they are. For that we have many different functions at our disposal. Below are the functions implemented in the module:
manhattan_distance)One of the simplest distance functions. It calculates the difference between the coordinates/features of two items. To understand how it works, imagine a 2D grid with coordinates x and y. In that grid we have two items, at the squares positioned at (1,2) and (3,4). The difference between their two coordinates is 3-1=2 and 4-2=2. If we sum these up we get 4. That means to get from (1,2) to (3,4) we need four moves; two to the right and two more up. The function works similarly for n-dimensional grids.
In [16]:
def manhattan_distance(X, Y):
return sum([abs(x - y) for x, y in zip(X, Y)])
distance = manhattan_distance([1,2], [3,4])
print("Manhattan Distance between (1,2) and (3,4) is", distance)
In [17]:
def euclidean_distance(X, Y):
return math.sqrt(sum([(x - y)**2 for x, y in zip(X,Y)]))
distance = euclidean_distance([1,2], [3,4])
print("Euclidean Distance between (1,2) and (3,4) is", distance)
hamming_distance)This function counts the number of differences between single elements in two items. For example, if we have two binary strings "111" and "011" the function will return 1, since the two strings only differ at the first element. The function works the same way for non-binary strings too.
In [18]:
def hamming_distance(X, Y):
return sum(x != y for x, y in zip(X, Y))
distance = hamming_distance(['a','b','c'], ['a','b','b'])
print("Hamming Distance between 'abc' and 'abb' is", distance)
In [19]:
def mean_boolean_error(X, Y):
return mean(int(x != y) for x, y in zip(X, Y))
distance = mean_boolean_error([1,2,3], [1,4,5])
print("Mean Boolean Error Distance between (1,2,3) and (1,4,5) is", distance)
In [20]:
def mean_error(X, Y):
return mean([abs(x - y) for x, y in zip(X, Y)])
distance = mean_error([1,0,5], [3,10,5])
print("Mean Error Distance between (1,0,5) and (3,10,5) is", distance)
In [21]:
def ms_error(X, Y):
return mean([(x - y)**2 for x, y in zip(X, Y)])
distance = ms_error([1,0,5], [3,10,5])
print("Mean Square Distance between (1,0,5) and (3,10,5) is", distance)
In [22]:
def rms_error(X, Y):
return math.sqrt(ms_error(X, Y))
distance = rms_error([1,0,5], [3,10,5])
print("Root of Mean Error Distance between (1,0,5) and (3,10,5) is", distance)
The Plurality Learner is a simple algorithm, used mainly as a baseline comparison for other algorithms. It finds the most popular class in the dataset and classifies any subsequent item to that class. Essentially, it classifies every new item to the same class. For that reason, it is not used very often, instead opting for more complicated algorithms when we want accurate classification.
Let's see how the classifier works with the plot above. There are three classes named Class A (orange-colored dots) and Class B (blue-colored dots) and Class C (green-colored dots). Every point in this plot has two features (i.e. X1, X2). Now, let's say we have a new point, a red star and we want to know which class this red star belongs to. Solving this problem by predicting the class of this new red star is our current classification problem.
The Plurality Learner will find the class most represented in the plot. Class A has four items, Class B has three and Class C has seven. The most popular class is Class C. Therefore, the item will get classified in Class C, despite the fact that it is closer to the other two classes.
In [ ]:
psource(PluralityLearner)
It takes as input a dataset and returns a function. We can later call this function with the item we want to classify as the argument and it returns the class it should be classified in.
The function first finds the most popular class in the dataset and then each time we call its "predict" function, it returns it. Note that the input ("example") does not matter. The function always returns the same class.
In [24]:
zoo = DataSet(name="zoo")
pL = PluralityLearner(zoo)
print(pL([1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 4, 1, 0, 1]))
The output for the above code is "mammal", since that is the most popular and common class in the dataset.
The k-Nearest Neighbors algorithm is a non-parametric method used for classification and regression. We are going to use this to classify Iris flowers. More about kNN on Scholarpedia.
Let's see how kNN works with a simple plot shown in the above picture.
We have co-ordinates (we call them features in Machine Learning) of this red star and we need to predict its class using the kNN algorithm. In this algorithm, the value of k is arbitrary. k is one of the hyper parameters for kNN algorithm. We choose this number based on our dataset and choosing a particular number is known as hyper parameter tuning/optimising. We learn more about this in coming topics.
Let's put k = 3. It means you need to find 3-Nearest Neighbors of this red star and classify this new point into the majority class. Observe that smaller circle which contains three points other than test point (red star). As there are two violet points, which form the majority, we predict the class of red star as violet- Class B.
Similarly if we put k = 5, you can observe that there are three yellow points, which form the majority. So, we classify our test point as yellow- Class A.
In practical tasks, we iterate through a bunch of values for k (like [1, 3, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100]), see how it performs and select the best one.
In [ ]:
psource(NearestNeighborLearner)
It takes as input a dataset and k (default value is 1) and it returns a function, which we can later use to classify a new item.
To accomplish that, the function uses a heap-queue, where the items of the dataset are sorted according to their distance from example (the item to classify). We then take the k smallest elements from the heap-queue and we find the majority class. We classify the item to this class.
In [26]:
iris = DataSet(name="iris")
kNN = NearestNeighborLearner(iris,k=3)
print(kNN([5.1,3.0,1.1,0.1]))
The output of the above code is "setosa", which means the flower with the above measurements is of the "setosa" species.
A decision tree is a flowchart that uses a tree of decisions and their possible consequences for classification. At each non-leaf node of the tree an attribute of the input is tested, based on which corresponding branch leading to a child-node is selected. At the leaf node the input is classified based on the class label of this leaf node. The paths from root to leaves represent classification rules based on which leaf nodes are assigned class labels.
Decision tree learning is the construction of a decision tree from class-labeled training data. The data is expected to be a tuple in which each record of the tuple is an attribute used for classification. The decision tree is built top-down, by choosing a variable at each step that best splits the set of items. There are different metrics for measuring the "best split". These generally measure the homogeneity of the target variable within the subsets.
Gini impurity of a set is the probability of a randomly chosen element to be incorrectly labeled if it was randomly labeled according to the distribution of labels in the set.
$$I_G(p) = \sum{p_i(1 - p_i)} = 1 - \sum{p_i^2}$$We select split which minimizes the Gini impurity in childre nodes.
Information gain is based on the concept of entropy from information theory. Entropy is defined as:
$$H(p) = -\sum{p_i \log_2{p_i}}$$Information Gain is difference between entropy of the parent and weighted sum of entropy of children. The feature used for splitting is the one which provides the most information gain.
You can view the pseudocode by running the cell below:
In [ ]:
pseudocode("Decision Tree Learning")
In [ ]:
psource(DecisionFork)
DecisionFork holds the attribute, which is tested at that node, and a dict of branches. The branches store the child nodes, one for each of the attribute's values. Calling an object of this class as a function with input tuple as an argument returns the next node in the classification path based on the result of the attribute test.
In [ ]:
psource(DecisionLeaf)
The leaf node stores the class label in result. All input tuples' classification paths end on a DecisionLeaf whose result attribute decide their class.
In [ ]:
psource(DecisionTreeLearner)
The implementation of DecisionTreeLearner provided in learning.py uses information gain as the metric for selecting which attribute to test for splitting. The function builds the tree top-down in a recursive manner. Based on the input it makes one of the four choices:
The Naive Bayes algorithm is a probabilistic classifier, making use of Bayes' Theorem. The theorem states that the conditional probability of A given B equals the conditional probability of B given A multiplied by the probability of A, divided by the probability of B.
$$P(A|B) = \dfrac{P(B|A)*P(A)}{P(B)}$$From the theory of Probabilities we have the Multiplication Rule, if the events X are independent the following is true:
$$P(X_{1} \cap X_{2} \cap ... \cap X_{n}) = P(X_{1})*P(X_{2})*...*P(X_{n})$$For conditional probabilities this becomes:
$$P(X_{1}, X_{2}, ..., X_{n}|Y) = P(X_{1}|Y)*P(X_{2}|Y)*...*P(X_{n}|Y)$$How can we use the above to classify an item though?
We have a dataset with a set of classes (C) and we want to classify an item with a set of features (F). Essentially what we want to do is predict the class of an item given the features.
For a specific class, Class, we will find the conditional probability given the item features:
$$P(Class|F) = \dfrac{P(F|Class)*P(Class)}{P(F)}$$We will do this for every class and we will pick the maximum. This will be the class the item is classified in.
The features though are a vector with many elements. We need to break the probabilities up using the multiplication rule. Thus the above equation becomes:
$$P(Class|F) = \dfrac{P(Class)*P(F_{1}|Class)*P(F_{2}|Class)*...*P(F_{n}|Class)}{P(F_{1})*P(F_{2})*...*P(F_{n})}$$The calculation of the conditional probability then depends on the calculation of the following:
a) The probability of Class in the dataset.
b) The conditional probability of each feature occuring in an item classified in Class.
c) The probabilities of each individual feature.
For a), we will count how many times Class occurs in the dataset (aka how many items are classified in a particular class).
For b), if the feature values are discrete ('Blue', '3', 'Tall', etc.), we will count how many times a feature value occurs in items of each class. If the feature values are not discrete, we will go a different route. We will use a distribution function to calculate the probability of values for a given class and feature. If we know the distribution function of the dataset, then great, we will use it to compute the probabilities. If we don't know the function, we can assume the dataset follows the normal (Gaussian) distribution without much loss of accuracy. In fact, it can be proven that any distribution tends to the Gaussian the larger the population gets (see Central Limit Theorem).
NOTE: If the values are continuous but use the discrete approach, there might be issues if we are not lucky. For one, if we have two values, '5.0 and 5.1', with the discrete approach they will be two completely different values, despite being so close. Second, if we are trying to classify an item with a feature value of '5.15', if the value does not appear for the feature, its probability will be 0. This might lead to misclassification. Generally, the continuous approach is more accurate and more useful, despite the overhead of calculating the distribution function.
The last one, c), is tricky. If feature values are discrete, we can count how many times they occur in the dataset. But what if the feature values are continuous? Imagine a dataset with a height feature. Is it worth it to count how many times each value occurs? Most of the time it is not, since there can be miscellaneous differences in the values (for example, 1.7 meters and 1.700001 meters are practically equal, but they count as different values).
So as we cannot calculate the feature value probabilities, what are we going to do?
Let's take a step back and rethink exactly what we are doing. We are essentially comparing conditional probabilities of all the classes. For two classes, A and B, we want to know which one is greater:
$$\dfrac{P(F|A)*P(A)}{P(F)} vs. \dfrac{P(F|B)*P(B)}{P(F)}$$Wait, P(F) is the same for both the classes! In fact, it is the same for every combination of classes. That is because P(F) does not depend on a class, thus being independent of the classes.
So, for c), we actually don't need to calculate it at all.
Classifying an item to a class then becomes a matter of calculating the conditional probabilities of feature values and the probabilities of classes. This is something very desirable and computationally delicious.
Remember though that all the above are true because we made the assumption that the features are independent. In most real-world cases that is not true though. Is that an issue here? Fret not, for the the algorithm is very efficient even with that assumption. That is why the algorithm is called Naive Bayes Classifier. We (naively) assume that the features are independent to make computations easier.
The implementation of the Naive Bayes Classifier is split in two; Learning and Simple. The learning classifier takes as input a dataset and learns the needed distributions from that. It is itself split into two, for discrete and continuous features. The simple classifier takes as input not a dataset, but already calculated distributions (a dictionary of CountingProbDist objects).
With the below code you can see the probabilities of the class "Setosa" appearing in the dataset and the probability of the first feature (at index 0) of the same class having a value of 5. Notice that the second probability is relatively small, even though if we observe the dataset we will find that a lot of values are around 5. The issue arises because the features in the Iris dataset are continuous, and we are assuming they are discrete. If the features were discrete (for example, "Tall", "3", etc.) this probably wouldn't have been the case and we would see a much nicer probability distribution.
In [30]:
dataset = iris
target_vals = dataset.values[dataset.target]
target_dist = CountingProbDist(target_vals)
attr_dists = {(gv, attr): CountingProbDist(dataset.values[attr])
for gv in target_vals
for attr in dataset.inputs}
for example in dataset.examples:
targetval = example[dataset.target]
target_dist.add(targetval)
for attr in dataset.inputs:
attr_dists[targetval, attr].add(example[attr])
print(target_dist['setosa'])
print(attr_dists['setosa', 0][5.0])
First we found the different values for the classes (called targets here) and calculated their distribution. Next we initialized a dictionary of CountingProbDist objects, one for each class and feature. Finally, we iterated through the examples in the dataset and calculated the needed probabilites.
Having calculated the different probabilities, we will move on to the predicting function. It will receive as input an item and output the most likely class. Using the above formula, it will multiply the probability of the class appearing, with the probability of each feature value appearing in the class. It will return the max result.
In [31]:
def predict(example):
def class_probability(targetval):
return (target_dist[targetval] *
product(attr_dists[targetval, attr][example[attr]]
for attr in dataset.inputs))
return argmax(target_vals, key=class_probability)
print(predict([5, 3, 1, 0.1]))
You can view the complete code by executing the next line:
In [ ]:
psource(NaiveBayesDiscrete)
In the implementation we use the Gaussian/Normal distribution function. To make it work, we need to find the means and standard deviations of features for each class. We make use of the find_means_and_deviations Dataset function. On top of that, we will also calculate the class probabilities as we did with the Discrete approach.
In [33]:
means, deviations = dataset.find_means_and_deviations()
target_vals = dataset.values[dataset.target]
target_dist = CountingProbDist(target_vals)
print(means["setosa"])
print(deviations["versicolor"])
You can see the means of the features for the "Setosa" class and the deviations for "Versicolor".
The prediction function will work similarly to the Discrete algorithm. It will multiply the probability of the class occuring with the conditional probabilities of the feature values for the class.
Since we are using the Gaussian distribution, we will input the value for each feature into the Gaussian function, together with the mean and deviation of the feature. This will return the probability of the particular feature value for the given class. We will repeat for each class and pick the max value.
In [34]:
def predict(example):
def class_probability(targetval):
prob = target_dist[targetval]
for attr in dataset.inputs:
prob *= gaussian(means[targetval][attr], deviations[targetval][attr], example[attr])
return prob
return argmax(target_vals, key=class_probability)
print(predict([5, 3, 1, 0.1]))
The complete code of the continuous algorithm:
In [ ]:
psource(NaiveBayesContinuous)
The simple classifier (chosen with the argument simple) does not learn from a dataset, instead it takes as input a dictionary of already calculated CountingProbDist objects and returns a predictor function. The dictionary is in the following form: (Class Name, Class Probability): CountingProbDist Object.
Each class has its own probability distribution. The classifier given a list of features calculates the probability of the input for each class and returns the max. The only pre-processing work is to create dictionaries for the distribution of classes (named targets) and attributes/features.
The complete code for the simple classifier:
In [ ]:
psource(NaiveBayesSimple)
This classifier is useful when you already have calculated the distributions and you need to predict future items.
In [36]:
nBD = NaiveBayesLearner(iris, continuous=False)
print("Discrete Classifier")
print(nBD([5, 3, 1, 0.1]))
print(nBD([6, 5, 3, 1.5]))
print(nBD([7, 3, 6.5, 2]))
nBC = NaiveBayesLearner(iris, continuous=True)
print("\nContinuous Classifier")
print(nBC([5, 3, 1, 0.1]))
print(nBC([6, 5, 3, 1.5]))
print(nBC([7, 3, 6.5, 2]))
Notice how the Discrete Classifier misclassified the second item, while the Continuous one had no problem.
Let's now take a look at the simple classifier. First we will come up with a sample problem to solve. Say we are given three bags. Each bag contains three letters ('a', 'b' and 'c') of different quantities. We are given a string of letters and we are tasked with finding from which bag the string of letters came.
Since we know the probability distribution of the letters for each bag, we can use the naive bayes classifier to make our prediction.
In [2]:
bag1 = 'a'*50 + 'b'*30 + 'c'*15
dist1 = CountingProbDist(bag1)
bag2 = 'a'*30 + 'b'*45 + 'c'*20
dist2 = CountingProbDist(bag2)
bag3 = 'a'*20 + 'b'*20 + 'c'*35
dist3 = CountingProbDist(bag3)
Now that we have the CountingProbDist objects for each bag/class, we will create the dictionary. We assume that it is equally probable that we will pick from any bag.
In [3]:
dist = {('First', 0.5): dist1, ('Second', 0.3): dist2, ('Third', 0.2): dist3}
nBS = NaiveBayesLearner(dist, simple=True)
Now we can start making predictions:
In [4]:
print(nBS('aab')) # We can handle strings
print(nBS(['b', 'b'])) # And lists!
print(nBS('ccbcc'))
The results make intuitive sence. The first bag has a high amount of 'a's, the second has a high amount of 'b's and the third has a high amount of 'c's. The classifier seems to confirm this intuition.
Note that the simple classifier doesn't distinguish between discrete and continuous values. It just takes whatever it is given. Also, the simple option on the NaiveBayesLearner overrides the continuous argument. NaiveBayesLearner(d, simple=True, continuous=False) just creates a simple classifier.
The Perceptron is a linear classifier. It works the same way as a neural network with no hidden layers (just input and output). First it trains its weights given a dataset and then it can classify a new item by running it through the network.
Its input layer consists of the the item features, while the output layer consists of nodes (also called neurons). Each node in the output layer has n synapses (for every item feature), each with its own weight. Then, the nodes find the dot product of the item features and the synapse weights. These values then pass through an activation function (usually a sigmoid). Finally, we pick the largest of the values and we return its index.
Note that in classification problems each node represents a class. The final classification is the class/node with the max output value.
Below you can see a single node/neuron in the outer layer. With f we denote the item features, with w the synapse weights, then inside the node we have the dot product and the activation function, g.
First, we train (calculate) the weights given a dataset, using the BackPropagationLearner function of learning.py. We then return a function, predict, which we will use in the future to classify a new item. The function computes the (algebraic) dot product of the item with the calculated weights for each node in the outer layer. Then it picks the greatest value and classifies the item in the corresponding class.
In [ ]:
psource(PerceptronLearner)
Note that the Perceptron is a one-layer neural network, without any hidden layers. So, in BackPropagationLearner, we will pass no hidden layers. From that function we get our network, which is just one layer, with the weights calculated.
That function predict passes the input/example through the network, calculating the dot product of the input and the weights for each node and returns the class with the max dot product.
In [38]:
iris = DataSet(name="iris")
iris.classes_to_numbers()
perceptron = PerceptronLearner(iris)
print(perceptron([5, 3, 1, 0.1]))
The correct output is 0, which means the item belongs in the first class, "setosa". Note that the Perceptron algorithm is not perfect and may produce false classifications.
In [42]:
iris = DataSet(name="iris")
In [43]:
nBD = NaiveBayesLearner(iris, continuous=False)
print("Error ratio for Discrete:", err_ratio(nBD, iris))
nBC = NaiveBayesLearner(iris, continuous=True)
print("Error ratio for Continuous:", err_ratio(nBC, iris))
The error for the Naive Bayes algorithm is very, very low; close to 0. There is also very little difference between the discrete and continuous version of the algorithm.
In [44]:
kNN_1 = NearestNeighborLearner(iris, k=1)
kNN_3 = NearestNeighborLearner(iris, k=3)
kNN_5 = NearestNeighborLearner(iris, k=5)
kNN_7 = NearestNeighborLearner(iris, k=7)
print("Error ratio for k=1:", err_ratio(kNN_1, iris))
print("Error ratio for k=3:", err_ratio(kNN_3, iris))
print("Error ratio for k=5:", err_ratio(kNN_5, iris))
print("Error ratio for k=7:", err_ratio(kNN_7, iris))
Notice how the error became larger and larger as k increased. This is generally the case with datasets where classes are spaced out, as is the case with the iris dataset. If items from different classes were closer together, classification would be more difficult. Usually a value of 1, 3 or 5 for k suffices.
Also note that since the training set is also the testing set, for k equal to 1 we get a perfect score, since the item we want to classify each time is already in the dataset and its closest neighbor is itself.
In [45]:
iris2 = DataSet(name="iris")
iris2.classes_to_numbers()
perceptron = PerceptronLearner(iris2)
print("Error ratio for Perceptron:", err_ratio(perceptron, iris2))
The Perceptron didn't fare very well mainly because the dataset is not linearly separated. On simpler datasets the algorithm performs much better, but unfortunately such datasets are rare in real life scenarios.