# Softmax exercise

Complete and hand in this completed worksheet (including its outputs and any supporting code outside of the worksheet) with your assignment submission. For more details see the assignments page on the course website.

This exercise is analogous to the SVM exercise. You will:

• implement a fully-vectorized loss function for the Softmax classifier
• implement the fully-vectorized expression for its analytic gradient
• use a validation set to tune the learning rate and regularization strength
• optimize the loss function with SGD
• visualize the final learned weights
``````

In [1]:

import random
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
%matplotlib inline
plt.rcParams['figure.figsize'] = (10.0, 8.0) # set default size of plots
plt.rcParams['image.interpolation'] = 'nearest'
plt.rcParams['image.cmap'] = 'gray'

``````
``````

In [2]:

def get_CIFAR10_data(num_training=49000, num_validation=1000, num_test=1000, num_dev=500):
"""
Load the CIFAR-10 dataset from disk and perform preprocessing to prepare
it for the linear classifier. These are the same steps as we used for the
SVM, but condensed to a single function.
"""
# Load the raw CIFAR-10 data
cifar10_dir = '../skynet/datasets/cifar-10-batches-py'
X_train, y_train, X_test, y_test = load_CIFAR10(cifar10_dir)

# subsample the data
mask = list(range(num_training, num_training + num_validation))

# Preprocessing: reshape the image data into rows
X_train = np.reshape(X_train, (X_train.shape[0], -1))
X_val = np.reshape(X_val, (X_val.shape[0], -1))
X_test = np.reshape(X_test, (X_test.shape[0], -1))
X_dev = np.reshape(X_dev, (X_dev.shape[0], -1))

# Normalize the data: subtract the mean image
mean_image = np.mean(X_train, axis = 0)
X_train -= mean_image
X_val -= mean_image
X_test -= mean_image
X_dev -= mean_image

# add bias dimension and transform into columns
X_train = np.hstack([X_train, np.ones((X_train.shape[0], 1))])
X_val = np.hstack([X_val, np.ones((X_val.shape[0], 1))])
X_test = np.hstack([X_test, np.ones((X_test.shape[0], 1))])
X_dev = np.hstack([X_dev, np.ones((X_dev.shape[0], 1))])

return X_train, y_train, X_val, y_val, X_test, y_test, X_dev, y_dev

# Invoke the above function to get our data.
X_train, y_train, X_val, y_val, X_test, y_test, X_dev, y_dev = get_CIFAR10_data()
print('Train data shape: ', X_train.shape)
print('Train labels shape: ', y_train.shape)
print('Validation data shape: ', X_val.shape)
print('Validation labels shape: ', y_val.shape)
print('Test data shape: ', X_test.shape)
print('Test labels shape: ', y_test.shape)
print('dev data shape: ', X_dev.shape)
print('dev labels shape: ', y_dev.shape)

``````
``````

Train data shape:  (49000, 3073)
Train labels shape:  (49000,)
Validation data shape:  (1000, 3073)
Validation labels shape:  (1000,)
Test data shape:  (1000, 3073)
Test labels shape:  (1000,)
dev data shape:  (500, 3073)
dev labels shape:  (500,)

``````

## Softmax Classifier

Your code for this section will all be written inside linear/classifiers/softmax.py.

``````

In [3]:

# First implement the naive softmax loss function with nested loops.
# Open the file cs231n/classifiers/softmax.py and implement the
# softmax_loss_naive function.

from skynet.linear.softmax import softmax_loss_naive
import time

# Generate a random softmax weight matrix and use it to compute the loss.
W = np.random.randn(3073, 10) * 0.0001 # D x C
loss, grad = softmax_loss_naive(W, X_dev, y_dev, 0.0)

# As a rough sanity check, our loss should be something close to -log(0.1).
print('loss: %f' % loss)
print('sanity check: %f' % (-np.log(0.1)))

``````
``````

loss: 2.369651
sanity check: 2.302585

``````

## Inline Question 1:

Why do we expect our loss to be close to -log(0.1)? Explain briefly.**

By randomly initializing the weights, the prediction results for each class tend to be of equal probability. And there are 10 classes, meaning each has a probability of 1/10.

``````

In [4]:

# Complete the implementation of softmax_loss_naive and implement a (naive)
# version of the gradient that uses nested loops.
loss, grad = softmax_loss_naive(W, X_dev, y_dev, 0.0)

# As we did for the SVM, use numeric gradient checking as a debugging tool.
f = lambda w: softmax_loss_naive(w, X_dev, y_dev, 0.0)[0]

# similar to SVM case, do another gradient check with regularization
loss, grad = softmax_loss_naive(W, X_dev, y_dev, 1e2)
f = lambda w: softmax_loss_naive(w, X_dev, y_dev, 1e2)[0]

``````
``````

numerical: 1.794679 analytic: 1.794679, relative error: 2.501120e-09
numerical: -2.047843 analytic: -2.047843, relative error: 1.510634e-08
numerical: -1.338093 analytic: -1.338093, relative error: 9.466247e-09
numerical: 1.540616 analytic: 1.540616, relative error: 3.458885e-08
numerical: 0.275297 analytic: 0.275297, relative error: 1.135912e-07
numerical: -5.975292 analytic: -5.975292, relative error: 7.047495e-10
numerical: -3.156706 analytic: -3.156706, relative error: 1.598705e-08
numerical: 1.332692 analytic: 1.332692, relative error: 7.460575e-08
numerical: -1.749183 analytic: -1.749183, relative error: 1.117724e-09
numerical: -0.445788 analytic: -0.445788, relative error: 1.361485e-09
numerical: 0.793491 analytic: 0.793491, relative error: 9.097127e-08
numerical: 1.853737 analytic: 1.853737, relative error: 1.621229e-08
numerical: -0.744759 analytic: -0.744759, relative error: 1.391429e-07
numerical: 2.756890 analytic: 2.756890, relative error: 8.666795e-09
numerical: 0.867358 analytic: 0.867358, relative error: 1.686795e-08
numerical: 1.544908 analytic: 1.544908, relative error: 4.170542e-08
numerical: -0.723113 analytic: -0.723113, relative error: 3.021171e-08
numerical: 2.069550 analytic: 2.069550, relative error: 1.991153e-08
numerical: 2.000204 analytic: 2.000204, relative error: 2.616614e-08
numerical: 3.892708 analytic: 3.892708, relative error: 2.660912e-08

``````
``````

In [5]:

# Now that we have a naive implementation of the softmax loss function and its gradient,
# implement a vectorized version in softmax_loss_vectorized.
# The two versions should compute the same results, but the vectorized version should be
# much faster.
tic = time.time()
loss_naive, grad_naive = softmax_loss_naive(W, X_dev, y_dev, 0.00001)
toc = time.time()
print('naive loss: %e computed in %fs' % (loss_naive, toc - tic))

from skynet.linear.softmax import softmax_loss_vectorized
tic = time.time()
loss_vectorized, grad_vectorized = softmax_loss_vectorized(W, X_dev, y_dev, 0.00001)
toc = time.time()
print('vectorized loss: %e computed in %fs' % (loss_vectorized, toc - tic))

# As we did for the SVM, we use the Frobenius norm to compare the two versions
print('Loss difference: %f' % np.abs(loss_naive - loss_vectorized))

``````
``````

naive loss: 2.369651e+00 computed in 0.085196s
vectorized loss: 2.369651e+00 computed in 0.004321s
Loss difference: 0.000000

``````
``````

In [6]:

# Use the validation set to tune hyperparameters (regularization strength and
# learning rate). You should experiment with different ranges for the learning
# rates and regularization strengths; if you are careful you should be able to
# get a classification accuracy of over 0.35 on the validation set.
from skynet.linear import Softmax
results = {}
best_val = -1
best_softmax = None
# Grid search
# learning_rates = [1e-7, 3e-7, 5e-7, 7e-7, 1e-6, 3e-6]
# regularization_strengths = [1e-5, 5e-5, 1e-4, 3e-4, 5e-4, 1e-3]
# learning_rates = np.logspace(-7, -6, 5)
# regularization_strengths = np.logspace(3, 4, 5)

# Random search
learning_rates = sorted(10**np.random.uniform(-7, -5, 6))
regularization_strengths = sorted(10**np.random.uniform(3, 4, 6))
# regularization_strengths = sorted(10**np.random.uniform(4, 4.2, 6))

# best hyperparameters found for classification performance with
# accuracy: 0.407020, 0.404000, 0.394000
# learning_rates = [9.740577e-07]
# regularization_strengths = [1.469906e+03]

################################################################################
# TODO:                                                                        #
# Use the validation set to set the learning rate and regularization strength. #
# This should be identical to the validation that you did for the SVM; save    #
# the best trained softmax classifer in best_softmax.                          #
################################################################################
for learning_rate in learning_rates:
for reg in regularization_strengths:
classifier = Softmax()
classifier.train(X_train, y_train,
learning_rate=learning_rate, reg=reg, num_iters=1500,
batch_size=200, verbose=False)
y_train_predict = classifier.predict(X_train)
y_val_predict = classifier.predict(X_val)
train_accuracy = np.mean(y_train==y_train_predict)
val_accuracy = np.mean(y_val==y_val_predict)
results[(learning_rate, reg,)] = (train_accuracy, val_accuracy)
if val_accuracy > best_val:
best_val = val_accuracy
best_softmax = classifier
print('lr %e reg %e train accuracy: %f val accuracy: %f' % (
learning_rate, reg, train_accuracy, val_accuracy))
pass
################################################################################
#                              END OF YOUR CODE                                #
################################################################################
print('best validation accuracy achieved during cross-validation: %f' % best_val)

``````
``````

lr 2.322013e-07 reg 1.019761e+03 train accuracy: 0.301265 val accuracy: 0.316000
lr 2.322013e-07 reg 1.324964e+03 train accuracy: 0.315959 val accuracy: 0.310000
lr 2.322013e-07 reg 1.796276e+03 train accuracy: 0.326531 val accuracy: 0.337000
lr 2.322013e-07 reg 2.862885e+03 train accuracy: 0.347061 val accuracy: 0.367000
lr 2.322013e-07 reg 4.230012e+03 train accuracy: 0.362204 val accuracy: 0.379000
lr 2.322013e-07 reg 5.227460e+03 train accuracy: 0.375286 val accuracy: 0.390000
lr 4.016129e-07 reg 1.019761e+03 train accuracy: 0.350694 val accuracy: 0.361000
lr 4.016129e-07 reg 1.324964e+03 train accuracy: 0.358347 val accuracy: 0.362000
lr 4.016129e-07 reg 1.796276e+03 train accuracy: 0.372286 val accuracy: 0.372000
lr 4.016129e-07 reg 2.862885e+03 train accuracy: 0.383878 val accuracy: 0.387000
lr 4.016129e-07 reg 4.230012e+03 train accuracy: 0.389755 val accuracy: 0.396000
lr 4.016129e-07 reg 5.227460e+03 train accuracy: 0.382755 val accuracy: 0.392000
lr 6.378143e-07 reg 1.019761e+03 train accuracy: 0.379449 val accuracy: 0.376000
lr 6.378143e-07 reg 1.324964e+03 train accuracy: 0.391694 val accuracy: 0.401000
lr 6.378143e-07 reg 1.796276e+03 train accuracy: 0.395082 val accuracy: 0.400000
lr 6.378143e-07 reg 2.862885e+03 train accuracy: 0.394510 val accuracy: 0.407000
lr 6.378143e-07 reg 4.230012e+03 train accuracy: 0.386959 val accuracy: 0.394000
lr 6.378143e-07 reg 5.227460e+03 train accuracy: 0.384286 val accuracy: 0.404000
lr 8.469655e-07 reg 1.019761e+03 train accuracy: 0.398184 val accuracy: 0.410000
lr 8.469655e-07 reg 1.324964e+03 train accuracy: 0.401061 val accuracy: 0.383000
lr 8.469655e-07 reg 1.796276e+03 train accuracy: 0.400429 val accuracy: 0.407000
lr 8.469655e-07 reg 2.862885e+03 train accuracy: 0.395796 val accuracy: 0.403000
lr 8.469655e-07 reg 4.230012e+03 train accuracy: 0.388061 val accuracy: 0.392000
lr 8.469655e-07 reg 5.227460e+03 train accuracy: 0.383592 val accuracy: 0.390000
lr 2.711425e-06 reg 1.019761e+03 train accuracy: 0.403878 val accuracy: 0.389000
lr 2.711425e-06 reg 1.324964e+03 train accuracy: 0.398633 val accuracy: 0.387000
lr 2.711425e-06 reg 1.796276e+03 train accuracy: 0.387367 val accuracy: 0.396000
lr 2.711425e-06 reg 2.862885e+03 train accuracy: 0.384898 val accuracy: 0.390000
lr 2.711425e-06 reg 4.230012e+03 train accuracy: 0.364245 val accuracy: 0.369000
lr 2.711425e-06 reg 5.227460e+03 train accuracy: 0.352653 val accuracy: 0.350000
lr 3.481635e-06 reg 1.019761e+03 train accuracy: 0.385327 val accuracy: 0.378000
lr 3.481635e-06 reg 1.324964e+03 train accuracy: 0.378939 val accuracy: 0.362000
lr 3.481635e-06 reg 1.796276e+03 train accuracy: 0.369898 val accuracy: 0.378000
lr 3.481635e-06 reg 2.862885e+03 train accuracy: 0.360061 val accuracy: 0.366000
lr 3.481635e-06 reg 4.230012e+03 train accuracy: 0.364327 val accuracy: 0.347000
lr 3.481635e-06 reg 5.227460e+03 train accuracy: 0.350816 val accuracy: 0.355000
best validation accuracy achieved during cross-validation: 0.410000

``````
``````

In [7]:

# evaluate on test set
# Evaluate the best softmax on test set
y_test_pred = best_softmax.predict(X_test)
test_accuracy = np.mean(y_test == y_test_pred)
print('softmax on raw pixels final test set accuracy: %f' % (test_accuracy, ))

``````
``````

softmax on raw pixels final test set accuracy: 0.370000

``````
``````

In [8]:

def visualize_weights(weights):
"""
Visualize the learned weights for each class
"""
#     w = weights[:-1,:] # strip out the bias
w = weights
w = w.reshape(32, 32, 3, 10)

w_min, w_max = np.min(w), np.max(w)

classes = ['plane', 'car', 'bird', 'cat', 'deer', 'dog', 'frog', 'horse', 'ship', 'truck']
for i in range(10):
plt.subplot(2, 5, i + 1)

# Rescale the weights to be between 0 and 255
wimg = 255.0 * (w[:, :, :, i].squeeze() - w_min) / (w_max - w_min)
plt.imshow(wimg.astype('uint8'))
plt.axis('off')
plt.title(classes[i])

``````
``````

In [9]:

# Visualize the learned weights for each class
visualize_weights(best_softmax.W[:-1,:])

``````
``````

``````

The learned weights for each class in softmax model resembles the shape of each class' object. The larger the regularization strength is, the more the weights are shrinked, giving less noise in the visualized image and making it more clear.

``````

In [10]:

# this will produce weights more similar to the class images
learning_rates = [4.019744e-07]
regularization_strengths = [1.130442e+04]
for learning_rate in learning_rates:
for reg in regularization_strengths:
classifier = Softmax()
classifier.train(X_train, y_train,
learning_rate=learning_rate, reg=reg, num_iters=1500,
batch_size=200, verbose=False)
y_train_predict = classifier.predict(X_train)
y_val_predict = classifier.predict(X_val)
train_accuracy = np.mean(y_train==y_train_predict)
val_accuracy = np.mean(y_val==y_val_predict)
results[(learning_rate, reg,)] = (train_accuracy, val_accuracy)
if val_accuracy > best_val:
best_val = val_accuracy
best_softmax = classifier
print('lr %e reg %e train accuracy: %f val accuracy: %f' % (
learning_rate, reg, train_accuracy, val_accuracy))

visualize_weights(classifier.W[:-1,:])

``````
``````

lr 4.019744e-07 reg 1.130442e+04 train accuracy: 0.369469 val accuracy: 0.383000

``````
``````

In [ ]:

``````