[[ 7 4 9 8 3 2 6 1 10 5]
[ 1 9 3 2 8 7 6 10 4 5]
[ 1 8 4 5 2 10 7 6 3 9]
[ 7 2 6 1 9 5 8 3 4 10]
[ 8 5 1 10 7 2 6 9 4 3]
[ 2 9 7 3 1 10 6 4 5 8]
[10 8 5 2 4 3 9 7 1 6]
[ 4 8 1 10 6 7 9 5 3 2]
[ 8 9 10 1 5 4 3 2 7 6]
[ 1 10 7 4 2 3 6 9 5 8]
[ 2 8 4 7 3 9 5 10 6 1]
[ 8 9 5 3 10 1 2 7 6 4]
[ 3 2 9 1 7 4 6 10 8 5]
[ 3 10 2 6 9 5 7 4 8 1]
[ 7 5 9 1 8 6 10 2 4 3]
[ 1 2 9 7 6 8 5 3 4 10]]
CPXPARAM_Read_DataCheck 1
CPXPARAM_Read_APIEncoding "UTF-8"
CPXPARAM_MIP_Strategy_CallbackReducedLP 0
Warning: Non-integral bounds for integer variables rounded.
Tried aggregator 2 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 19 rows and 0 columns.
Aggregator did 16 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 736 rows, 107 columns, and 4179 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 106 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.02 sec. (5.15 ticks)
Found incumbent of value 4.000000 after 0.02 sec. (5.75 ticks)
Probing fixed 16 vars, tightened 0 bounds.
Probing time = 0.02 sec. (10.26 ticks)
Cover probing fixed 0 vars, tightened 11 bounds.
Tried aggregator 1 time.
MIP Presolve eliminated 523 rows and 72 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 277 coefficients.
Reduced MIP has 213 rows, 35 columns, and 1254 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 34 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.01 sec. (4.64 ticks)
Probing fixed 30 vars, tightened 1 bounds.
Probing changed sense of 2 constraints.
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (0.32 ticks)
Cover probing fixed 0 vars, tightened 105 bounds.
Tried aggregator 1 time.
MIP Presolve eliminated 213 rows and 35 columns.
All rows and columns eliminated.
Presolve time = 0.00 sec. (0.12 ticks)
Root node processing (before b&c):
Real time = 0.07 sec. (21.77 ticks)
Parallel b&c, 4 threads:
Real time = 0.00 sec. (0.00 ticks)
Sync time (average) = 0.00 sec.
Wait time (average) = 0.00 sec.
------------
Total (root+branch&cut) = 0.07 sec. (21.77 ticks)
Solution status = 101 : MIP_optimal
Solution value = 4.0
Column 0: Value = 1.000000
Column 1: Value = 1.000000
Column 2: Value = 0.000000
Column 3: Value = 0.000000
Column 4: Value = -0.000000
Column 5: Value = -0.000000
Column 6: Value = 1.000000
Column 7: Value = 1.000000
Column 8: Value = -0.000000
Column 9: Value = 0.000000
Column 122: Value = 4.000000
[1, 2, 7, 8]
[[ 4 6 10 7 9 5 8 3 1 2]
[ 3 2 1 8 7 10 5 4 9 6]
[ 6 4 8 7 5 9 10 3 1 2]
[ 5 7 4 2 10 9 1 8 6 3]
[ 6 3 9 5 4 10 1 2 8 7]
[ 6 1 3 7 8 5 4 10 2 9]
[ 7 4 9 1 3 5 6 8 10 2]
[ 3 1 2 10 6 5 7 4 8 9]
[ 1 9 5 8 4 3 6 2 7 10]
[ 7 3 5 6 8 4 2 10 1 9]
[ 2 4 5 6 7 8 3 9 1 10]
[ 2 5 4 7 6 9 3 8 1 10]
[ 2 4 1 9 8 7 3 6 5 10]
[ 3 4 5 8 7 2 6 10 1 9]]
CPXPARAM_Read_DataCheck 1
CPXPARAM_Read_APIEncoding "UTF-8"
CPXPARAM_MIP_Strategy_CallbackReducedLP 0
Warning: Non-integral bounds for integer variables rounded.
Tried aggregator 2 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 25 rows and 0 columns.
Aggregator did 14 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 662 rows, 95 columns, and 3647 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 94 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.02 sec. (4.43 ticks)
Found incumbent of value 6.000000 after 0.02 sec. (4.96 ticks)
Probing fixed 14 vars, tightened 0 bounds.
Probing time = 0.01 sec. (8.47 ticks)
Cover probing fixed 0 vars, tightened 9 bounds.
Tried aggregator 1 time.
MIP Presolve eliminated 183 rows and 27 columns.
Reduced MIP has 479 rows, 68 columns, and 3056 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 67 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.01 sec. (4.01 ticks)
Probing fixed 28 vars, tightened 0 bounds.
Probing time = 0.01 sec. (4.56 ticks)
Tried aggregator 1 time.
MIP Presolve eliminated 185 rows and 30 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 4 coefficients.
Reduced MIP has 294 rows, 38 columns, and 1885 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 37 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.01 sec. (2.37 ticks)
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (1.73 ticks)
Tried aggregator 1 time.
Reduced MIP has 294 rows, 38 columns, and 1885 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 37 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.01 sec. (1.07 ticks)
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (1.69 ticks)
Clique table members: 378.
MIP emphasis: balance optimality and feasibility.
MIP search method: dynamic search.
Parallel mode: deterministic, using up to 4 threads.
Root relaxation solution time = 0.00 sec. (0.58 ticks)
Nodes Cuts/
Node Left Objective IInf Best Integer Best Bound ItCnt Gap
* 0+ 0 6.0000 1.0000 83.33%
0 0 2.6818 11 6.0000 2.6818 17 55.30%
0 0 2.9795 10 6.0000 Cuts: 24 28 50.34%
* 0+ 0 3.0000 2.9795 0.68%
0 0 cutoff 3.0000 28 0.00%
Elapsed time = 0.15 sec. (38.22 ticks, tree = 0.01 MB, solutions = 2)
Mixed integer rounding cuts applied: 2
Zero-half cuts applied: 4
Gomory fractional cuts applied: 1
Root node processing (before b&c):
Real time = 0.16 sec. (38.23 ticks)
Parallel b&c, 4 threads:
Real time = 0.00 sec. (0.00 ticks)
Sync time (average) = 0.00 sec.
Wait time (average) = 0.00 sec.
------------
Total (root+branch&cut) = 0.16 sec. (38.23 ticks)
Solution status = 101 : MIP_optimal
Solution value = 3.0
Column 0: Value = 0.000000
Column 1: Value = 1.000000
Column 2: Value = 1.000000
Column 3: Value = 0.000000
Column 4: Value = 0.000000
Column 5: Value = 1.000000
Column 6: Value = 1.000000
Column 7: Value = -0.000000
Column 8: Value = -0.000000
Column 9: Value = -0.000000
Column 108: Value = 3.000000
[2, 3, 6, 7]
[[ 4 3 8 1 2 10 9 7 6 5]
[ 8 6 5 7 1 4 9 3 2 10]
[ 3 7 6 1 4 10 9 5 8 2]
[ 2 7 4 10 9 1 5 8 3 6]
[10 6 1 9 8 2 4 7 5 3]
[ 1 6 4 2 8 5 7 3 10 9]
[ 4 2 7 8 5 3 1 10 9 6]
[ 7 9 6 10 1 3 2 5 4 8]
[ 9 4 3 8 6 2 7 1 5 10]]
CPXPARAM_Read_DataCheck 1
CPXPARAM_Read_APIEncoding "UTF-8"
CPXPARAM_MIP_Strategy_CallbackReducedLP 0
Warning: Non-integral bounds for integer variables rounded.
Tried aggregator 2 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 9 rows and 0 columns.
Aggregator did 9 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 508 rows, 65 columns, and 2809 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 64 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.01 sec. (2.81 ticks)
Found incumbent of value 6.833333 after 0.02 sec. (5.18 ticks)
Probing fixed 9 vars, tightened 0 bounds.
Probing time = 0.01 sec. (4.80 ticks)
Cover probing fixed 0 vars, tightened 1 bounds.
Tried aggregator 1 time.
MIP Presolve eliminated 76 rows and 10 columns.
Reduced MIP has 432 rows, 55 columns, and 2592 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 54 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.01 sec. (3.14 ticks)
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (2.28 ticks)
Tried aggregator 1 time.
Reduced MIP has 432 rows, 55 columns, and 2592 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 54 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.01 sec. (1.66 ticks)
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (2.28 ticks)
Clique table members: 648.
MIP emphasis: balance optimality and feasibility.
MIP search method: dynamic search.
Parallel mode: deterministic, using up to 4 threads.
Root relaxation solution time = 0.00 sec. (1.27 ticks)
Nodes Cuts/
Node Left Objective IInf Best Integer Best Bound ItCnt Gap
* 0+ 0 6.8333 1.0000 85.37%
0 0 2.2857 16 6.8333 2.2857 35 66.55%
* 0+ 0 4.0000 2.2857 42.86%
0 0 2.5006 17 4.0000 Cuts: 11 50 37.48%
0 0 2.5941 17 4.0000 Cuts: 8 64 35.15%
0 0 2.6039 18 4.0000 Cuts: 12 73 34.90%
0 0 2.6094 19 4.0000 MIRcuts: 4 79 34.76%
Repeating presolve.
Tried aggregator 1 time.
MIP Presolve eliminated 134 rows and 18 columns.
Reduced MIP has 298 rows, 37 columns, and 1824 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 36 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.01 sec. (1.91 ticks)
Probing fixed 15 vars, tightened 0 bounds.
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (1.06 ticks)
Tried aggregator 1 time.
MIP Presolve eliminated 88 rows and 15 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 4 coefficients.
Reduced MIP has 210 rows, 22 columns, and 1218 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 21 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.01 sec. (1.18 ticks)
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (0.31 ticks)
Tried aggregator 1 time.
Reduced MIP has 210 rows, 22 columns, and 1218 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 21 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.01 sec. (0.65 ticks)
Represolve time = 0.04 sec. (5.97 ticks)
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (0.30 ticks)
Clique table members: 66.
MIP emphasis: balance optimality and feasibility.
MIP search method: dynamic search.
Parallel mode: deterministic, using up to 4 threads.
Root relaxation solution time = 0.00 sec. (0.75 ticks)
Nodes Cuts/
Node Left Objective IInf Best Integer Best Bound ItCnt Gap
* 0+ 0 4.0000 2.6094 34.76%
0 0 2.6119 18 4.0000 2.6119 115 34.70%
0 0 2.6491 15 4.0000 LiftProj: 6 124 33.77%
0 0 2.6619 17 4.0000 Cuts: 7 139 33.45%
0 0 2.6667 18 4.0000 Cuts: 9 145 33.33%
0 0 2.6753 19 4.0000 Cuts: 3 153 33.12%
0 0 2.6798 18 4.0000 Cuts: 8 160 33.00%
0 0 2.6804 19 4.0000 Cuts: 9 164 32.99%
0 0 2.6817 17 4.0000 MIRcuts: 1 167 32.96%
0 0 2.6817 18 4.0000 MIRcuts: 1 168 32.96%
0 0 cutoff 4.0000 4.0000 168 0.00%
Elapsed time = 0.47 sec. (75.18 ticks, tree = 0.01 MB, solutions = 2)
Clique cuts applied: 2
Implied bound cuts applied: 1
Mixed integer rounding cuts applied: 3
Lift and project cuts applied: 6
Gomory fractional cuts applied: 2
Root node processing (before b&c):
Real time = 0.48 sec. (75.19 ticks)
Parallel b&c, 4 threads:
Real time = 0.00 sec. (0.00 ticks)
Sync time (average) = 0.00 sec.
Wait time (average) = 0.00 sec.
------------
Total (root+branch&cut) = 0.48 sec. (75.19 ticks)
Solution status = 101 : MIP_optimal
Solution value = 4.0
Column 0: Value = 0.000000
Column 1: Value = 0.000000
Column 2: Value = 0.000000
Column 3: Value = 1.000000
Column 4: Value = -0.000000
Column 5: Value = -0.000000
Column 6: Value = 1.000000
Column 7: Value = 1.000000
Column 8: Value = 0.000000
Column 9: Value = 1.000000
Column 73: Value = 4.000000
[4, 7, 8, 10]
[[ 2 3 10 1 7 9 8 4 5 6]
[ 2 1 6 5 10 3 9 7 4 8]
[ 1 7 8 10 9 3 5 4 2 6]
[ 7 2 6 9 5 10 8 4 1 3]
[ 3 4 5 2 10 9 6 7 1 8]
[ 6 5 10 7 8 1 4 3 2 9]
[10 4 3 2 8 7 1 6 9 5]
[ 2 1 7 10 9 8 3 4 5 6]
[ 2 4 1 8 10 7 5 3 9 6]
[10 5 8 9 4 2 3 6 1 7]
[ 7 6 5 9 1 3 2 8 4 10]
[ 4 5 2 1 7 9 6 3 10 8]]
CPXPARAM_Read_DataCheck 1
CPXPARAM_Read_APIEncoding "UTF-8"
CPXPARAM_MIP_Strategy_CallbackReducedLP 0
Warning: Non-integral bounds for integer variables rounded.
Tried aggregator 2 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 20 rows and 0 columns.
Aggregator did 12 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 599 rows, 83 columns, and 3279 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 82 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.01 sec. (3.72 ticks)
Found incumbent of value 10.333333 after 0.02 sec. (7.03 ticks)
Probing fixed 12 vars, tightened 0 bounds.
Probing time = 0.01 sec. (6.47 ticks)
Cover probing fixed 0 vars, tightened 2 bounds.
Tried aggregator 1 time.
MIP Presolve eliminated 100 rows and 13 columns.
Reduced MIP has 499 rows, 70 columns, and 2931 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 69 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.01 sec. (3.78 ticks)
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (2.74 ticks)
Tried aggregator 1 time.
Reduced MIP has 499 rows, 70 columns, and 2931 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 69 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.01 sec. (1.98 ticks)
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (2.73 ticks)
Clique table members: 1061.
MIP emphasis: balance optimality and feasibility.
MIP search method: dynamic search.
Parallel mode: deterministic, using up to 4 threads.
Root relaxation solution time = 0.00 sec. (1.08 ticks)
Nodes Cuts/
Node Left Objective IInf Best Integer Best Bound ItCnt Gap
* 0+ 0 10.3333 1.0000 90.32%
0 0 2.3590 14 10.3333 2.3590 26 77.17%
* 0+ 0 3.0000 2.3590 21.37%
0 0 2.6939 14 3.0000 Cuts: 14 48 10.20%
0 0 cutoff 3.0000 55 0.00%
Elapsed time = 0.11 sec. (38.16 ticks, tree = 0.01 MB, solutions = 2)
Mixed integer rounding cuts applied: 5
Lift and project cuts applied: 1
Gomory fractional cuts applied: 1
Root node processing (before b&c):
Real time = 0.11 sec. (38.18 ticks)
Parallel b&c, 4 threads:
Real time = 0.00 sec. (0.00 ticks)
Sync time (average) = 0.00 sec.
Wait time (average) = 0.00 sec.
------------
Total (root+branch&cut) = 0.11 sec. (38.18 ticks)
Solution status = 101 : MIP_optimal
Solution value = 3.0
Column 0: Value = 0.000000
Column 1: Value = 1.000000
Column 2: Value = 1.000000
Column 3: Value = 0.000000
Column 4: Value = -0.000000
Column 5: Value = 0.000000
Column 6: Value = 1.000000
Column 7: Value = -0.000000
Column 8: Value = -0.000000
Column 9: Value = 1.000000
Column 94: Value = 3.000000
[2, 3, 7, 10]
[[ 3 4 6 2 10 5 7 1 8 9]
[ 3 8 6 4 10 7 5 2 9 1]
[ 8 6 2 9 1 10 3 7 5 4]
[ 4 9 6 5 2 10 3 8 7 1]
[ 6 9 3 10 8 2 4 1 7 5]
[ 7 1 3 4 6 5 2 9 10 8]
[ 5 6 4 3 9 7 2 10 1 8]
[ 6 2 3 5 7 10 4 1 9 8]
[ 8 5 10 7 2 6 1 3 4 9]
[ 4 6 2 9 10 5 7 3 1 8]
[ 9 4 6 7 3 1 2 8 10 5]
[ 5 10 7 8 1 3 4 6 2 9]]
CPXPARAM_Read_DataCheck 1
CPXPARAM_Read_APIEncoding "UTF-8"
CPXPARAM_MIP_Strategy_CallbackReducedLP 0
Warning: Non-integral bounds for integer variables rounded.
Tried aggregator 2 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 24 rows and 0 columns.
Aggregator did 12 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 595 rows, 83 columns, and 3233 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 82 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.01 sec. (3.72 ticks)
Found incumbent of value 4.000000 after 0.01 sec. (4.20 ticks)
Probing fixed 12 vars, tightened 0 bounds.
Probing time = 0.01 sec. (6.61 ticks)
Cover probing fixed 0 vars, tightened 9 bounds.
Tried aggregator 1 time.
MIP Presolve eliminated 151 rows and 22 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 3 coefficients.
Reduced MIP has 444 rows, 61 columns, and 2779 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 60 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.01 sec. (3.52 ticks)
Probing fixed 43 vars, tightened 0 bounds.
Probing changed sense of 2 constraints.
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (2.69 ticks)
Cover probing fixed 0 vars, tightened 1 bounds.
Tried aggregator 2 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 309 rows and 43 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 222 coefficients.
Aggregator did 2 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 133 rows, 16 columns, and 737 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 15 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.01 sec. (3.63 ticks)
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (0.21 ticks)
Tried aggregator 1 time.
MIP Presolve eliminated 9 rows and 0 columns.
Reduced MIP has 124 rows, 16 columns, and 692 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 15 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.00 sec. (0.61 ticks)
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (0.19 ticks)
Clique table members: 62.
MIP emphasis: balance optimality and feasibility.
MIP search method: dynamic search.
Parallel mode: deterministic, using up to 4 threads.
Root relaxation solution time = 0.00 sec. (0.29 ticks)
Nodes Cuts/
Node Left Objective IInf Best Integer Best Bound ItCnt Gap
* 0+ 0 4.0000 2.0000 50.00%
0 0 2.9308 11 4.0000 2.9308 18 26.73%
0 0 3.1604 11 4.0000 Cuts: 43 28 20.99%
0 0 3.2957 10 4.0000 Cuts: 21 36 17.61%
0 0 3.3125 12 4.0000 Cuts: 8 39 17.19%
0 0 3.3463 12 4.0000 Cuts: 6 43 16.34%
0 0 cutoff 4.0000 4.0000 43 0.00%
Elapsed time = 0.13 sec. (29.56 ticks, tree = 0.01 MB, solutions = 1)
Implied bound cuts applied: 4
Mixed integer rounding cuts applied: 1
Gomory fractional cuts applied: 2
Root node processing (before b&c):
Real time = 0.13 sec. (29.57 ticks)
Parallel b&c, 4 threads:
Real time = 0.00 sec. (0.00 ticks)
Sync time (average) = 0.00 sec.
Wait time (average) = 0.00 sec.
------------
Total (root+branch&cut) = 0.13 sec. (29.57 ticks)
Solution status = 101 : MIP_optimal
Solution value = 4.0
Column 0: Value = 0.000000
Column 1: Value = 0.000000
Column 2: Value = 1.000000
Column 3: Value = 1.000000
Column 4: Value = 0.000000
Column 5: Value = 1.000000
Column 6: Value = 0.000000
Column 7: Value = 1.000000
Column 8: Value = 0.000000
Column 9: Value = 0.000000
Column 94: Value = 4.000000
[3, 4, 6, 8]
[[ 4 10 9 1 8 6 3 2 5 7]
[ 1 4 7 3 2 6 5 9 10 8]
[ 5 7 3 8 10 1 6 9 2 4]
[ 7 1 4 5 9 2 3 10 6 8]
[ 2 4 7 6 3 10 9 5 1 8]
[ 9 3 2 8 10 7 6 4 5 1]
[10 4 2 1 5 3 7 9 8 6]
[10 8 3 2 6 1 5 9 7 4]
[ 7 3 2 10 9 1 5 8 4 6]
[ 3 8 9 6 10 2 4 7 1 5]
[ 3 6 5 10 2 8 9 1 7 4]]
CPXPARAM_Read_DataCheck 1
CPXPARAM_Read_APIEncoding "UTF-8"
CPXPARAM_MIP_Strategy_CallbackReducedLP 0
Warning: Non-integral bounds for integer variables rounded.
Tried aggregator 2 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 14 rows and 0 columns.
Aggregator did 11 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 571 rows, 77 columns, and 3206 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 76 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.01 sec. (3.50 ticks)
Found incumbent of value 6.000000 after 0.01 sec. (3.97 ticks)
Probing fixed 11 vars, tightened 0 bounds.
Probing time = 0.01 sec. (6.30 ticks)
Cover probing fixed 0 vars, tightened 5 bounds.
Tried aggregator 1 time.
MIP Presolve eliminated 113 rows and 16 columns.
Reduced MIP has 458 rows, 61 columns, and 2885 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 60 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.01 sec. (3.66 ticks)
Probing fixed 7 vars, tightened 0 bounds.
Probing time = 0.01 sec. (3.85 ticks)
Tried aggregator 1 time.
MIP Presolve eliminated 49 rows and 8 columns.
Reduced MIP has 409 rows, 53 columns, and 2690 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 52 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.01 sec. (3.31 ticks)
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (2.55 ticks)
Clique table members: 817.
MIP emphasis: balance optimality and feasibility.
MIP search method: dynamic search.
Parallel mode: deterministic, using up to 4 threads.
Root relaxation solution time = 0.00 sec. (0.88 ticks)
Nodes Cuts/
Node Left Objective IInf Best Integer Best Bound ItCnt Gap
* 0+ 0 6.0000 1.0000 83.33%
* 0+ 0 5.0000 1.0000 80.00%
0 0 2.5455 13 5.0000 2.5455 20 49.09%
* 0+ 0 4.0000 2.5455 36.36%
0 0 2.8133 14 4.0000 Cuts: 12 32 29.67%
0 0 2.8996 12 4.0000 Cuts: 10 39 27.51%
0 0 2.9155 13 4.0000 Cuts: 14 42 27.11%
0 0 2.9180 13 4.0000 Cuts: 10 44 27.05%
0 0 2.9300 14 4.0000 Cuts: 13 47 26.75%
0 0 2.9304 15 4.0000 MIRcuts: 5 50 26.74%
0 0 2.9308 16 4.0000 Cuts: 14 53 26.73%
0 0 2.9331 15 4.0000 Cuts: 9 57 26.67%
* 0+ 0 4.0000 2.9331 26.67%
0 0 cutoff 4.0000 4.0000 59 0.00%
Elapsed time = 0.19 sec. (60.14 ticks, tree = 0.01 MB, solutions = 4)
Clique cuts applied: 2
Mixed integer rounding cuts applied: 4
Zero-half cuts applied: 5
Lift and project cuts applied: 1
Gomory fractional cuts applied: 2
Root node processing (before b&c):
Real time = 0.20 sec. (60.16 ticks)
Parallel b&c, 4 threads:
Real time = 0.00 sec. (0.00 ticks)
Sync time (average) = 0.00 sec.
Wait time (average) = 0.00 sec.
------------
Total (root+branch&cut) = 0.20 sec. (60.16 ticks)
Solution status = 101 : MIP_optimal
Solution value = 3.999999999
Column 0: Value = 0.000000
Column 1: Value = 0.000000
Column 2: Value = 1.000000
Column 3: Value = 0.000000
Column 4: Value = 1.000000
Column 5: Value = 0.000000
Column 6: Value = 1.000000
Column 7: Value = 0.000000
Column 8: Value = 0.000000
Column 9: Value = 1.000000
Column 87: Value = 4.000000
[1, 3, 5, 7, 10]